Posted by admin at 5:50 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
I bought a vehicle and the carfax report says that there is frame car damage?
I bought a vehicle and the carfax report says that there is frame car damage on this vehicle. Bought the car about 7 month ago and i am still making payment on it. The day that i bought the car the manager of the car dealership did not tell me about this damage, i am trying to sell the car that is when i discover that there is frame damage on this car via carfax. I called the dealership and i was told that there is noting they can do about and that they are not obligated by law to tell me the car history and however they are not aware of the accident. my question is should i get a lawyer in-regard to this or what can i do. the business is done in the commonwealth of Virginia. how can i returned my car back to the dealership.
Why didn’t you run the Carfax report PRIOR to buying the car? Or better yet, asked the dealership for a free report??????
Dealer is under no obligation to take the car back. They are only obligated to tell you if the car has a salvaged title or has been a lemon buyback. They don’t have to tell you every accident it was in….. which is not possible since they don’t know the entire history of their cars.
The car belongs to you. You can sell it at a big loss since other people check Carfax before they buy…. or continue driving it.
Chesapeake, VA Car Accident Injury Attorney: Pregnant Mother
Posted by admin at 10:51 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Accused says officers violated his charter rights
A man on trial for spitting in a cop’s face told a court Monday he was tackled by police before he could comply with their demands, and had his requests for legal counsel and medical attention ignored. No Fee Guarantee – Carter Mario Injury Lawyers – Connecticut
Posted by admin at 7:16 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
When you are involved in a traffic accident that causes serious damage to your vehicle or injury to you and / or its passengers, is a life experience. All are their responsibilities on hold. You must have your injury treated and your car or truck repaired or replaced, and depending on the extent of their injuries, can be put in place and can not work for an extended period of time.
Undoubtedly, when you are the victim of an accident, is facing many personal challenges. Fortunately, we are all obliged to take auto insurance, if at least the offending driver's insurance will cover your expenses, right? The short answer is yes, … if the driver follows the law and the insurance application. And if expenses do not exceed the limits of coverage the other driver.
The sad reality is that almost 15% of drivers Cruise the roads in the state of Georgia to defy the law and driving without insurance at all. Imagine being created by an injury, automobile, and I understand that the person that caused the accident was driving without insurance. Talk about adding insult to injury.
How many people can protect themselves against motorist sure, being uninsured / underinsured motorist of his own insurance policy. A new law, SB 276, contains the so-called "process of accumulation." This allows the insured "battery" or "piggy back" on their own uninsured motorist coverage beyond the responsible party if necessary. In other words, if you are in an accident with a driver who has insufficient insurance to pay your damages, your own coverage can be added or "stacked" in make a difference. For example, if you have $ 25,000 of coverage and its costs are $ 100,000, your insurance / coverage will make the difference motorist $ 75,000 (assuming you bought this much coverage when it renewed its contract).
It is always a good idea to consider the details of your car insurance policy was renewed. Under this new law, you may choose additional coverage stacked to reject or accept the limits of coverage of the driver responsible. When one considers the fact that approximately 15% of drivers are on the roads in Georgia is no coverage at all, may be a good idea to make sure they have motorist coverage uninsured important. Being in an accident of injury is not a pleasant experience, but being in an accident due to negligence of an uninsured motorist can be a nightmare if you do not adequate coverage of uninsured motorist.
If you are the victim on an injury accident in Atlanta, and you have a question about uninsured/under insured motorist coverage and “stacking,” call Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyer, Bruce Hagen at (404) 522-7553, or get in touch with him through the website: hagen-law.com. This new law is somewhat complex, so it is advisable to retain an experienced advocate to review your case and be certain that you are getting all of the compensation that is due you in matters that involve SB 276.
Posted by admin at 11:15 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
If my insurance company settled with my auto accident can it come back on me?
I was in an auto accident in 06. My insurance company settled with this woman back in begginning of 08. She accepted what my insurance wanted to give her which maxxed out my limits she initially wanted 95k and only got 50k. I live in Indiana. I was told she cannot come back on me and try to sue me since she settled with my insurance company. I got a letter in the mail from an Attorney were she is sueing her insurance company I don’t know whether its Auto or Health insurance. They are wanting me to be a witness and assist her to she if she has a claim against her insurance company. the letter says its a civil litigation in which she has requested substantial damages. Now if she wins against her insurance company can they come back on me to try and get payment because of her?
her car was paid for thats medical bills + pain and suffering I don’t have 50k for everything thats just for personal.
Charlie, I suggest you visit a nearby auto insurance agent to help. Since I live in Rhode Island I can’t recommend an agent in Indiana, but here is an website that can help you. http://www.multipleautoinsurancequotes.com/Indiana-Car-Insurance-Quotes.html
Good Luck!
Louisville Personal Injury Attorney Kentucky Accident Lawyer Indiana Insurance Defense Law Firm
Posted by admin at 2:34 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Missouri Second Injury Fund for the financial crisis threatens JEFFERSON CITY – Michael Simpson was born with a birth defect causing lifelong back problems. He had surgery to repair the fusion of the vertebrae, discs and vertebrae broken destroyed. And for years, the grandfather of 59 years, the Agency made maintain an independent lifestyle. After 32 years working as an electrician, however, the life that Simpson knew she was stopped after an injury Workplace … Truck Accident Lawyer St. Louis, MO | Truck Accident …
Posted by admin at 8:39 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
If you have tuned into any of the events of the 2010 Winter Olympics taking place in Vancouver, you undoubtedly have seen amazing moments of both artistry and athleticism. Despite all of the understandable concerns over the weather and the lack of snow at the various sites of competition (at the same time that nearly every state in our country had snow on the ground somewhere), the Olympic Games have pressed forward. Perhaps in part due to the unpredictable impact of the weather and also simply due to the intensity of the sports being showcased, you probably also have seen a few of the injuries that have taken place on the tracks and the hills. And, of course, there was the tragic death of Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili before the Games even began. These frightening instances bring up questions regarding the assumption of risk that both athletes and observers take when choosing to be a part of a sporting event.
The legal definition for “assumption of risk” is:
an affirmative defense that the plaintiff cannot receive compensation for injuries from the defendant because the plaintiff freely and knowingly assumed the risk of injury and relieved the defendant of the obligation to act with reasonable care.
When a college quarterback in Texas takes to the field on a Saturday night, he cannot sue the linebacker on Monday morning if he is sacked too many times and sustains serious injuries. Pain and broken bones are understood to be possible outcomes for those who choose to contribute their skills to a football team. Likewise, if you are in a seat along the third base line and become so engrossed in a conversation that you fail to see the foul ball that is speeding straight towards your head, you cannot bring a lawsuit against the man who runs the sound system because he did not grab the microphone and yell, “Look out!” You chose to place yourself in these potentially dangerous situations. You assumed the risk.
The idea that assumption of risk is an affirmative defense means that there is some reason to limit, excuse, or avoid criminal culpability or civil liability. If criminal charges or a request for compensation has been made, a defendant must “affirmatively” present evidence that a shared understanding of the potentially dangerous environment existed among everyone in attendance. In other words, once the notice is displayed during Detroit Red Wings games to watch out for flying pucks, the organization has met its obligation to remind spectators that they may leave the arena with fewer teeth than when they arrived. If you visit the website for campus recreation at Texas A & M University, you quickly will spot the consent form that all participants must sign before being allowed to engage in a volleyball or flag football grudge match against a rival fraternity.
Are there instances, however, when the environment in which an athlete or spectator finds himself goes beyond what should be deemed acceptable in terms of its risk? A fan of the Dallas Cowboys who chooses to attend a game at the home of division rivals Philadelphia Eagles while wearing a brand-new Tony Romo jersey may know that he will not be the most popular guy in his section. However, does he assume the risk of landing in a hospital following an altercation with five guys who thought that Michael Vick did not go far enough in teaching those dogs a lesson? And, to put the focus back on the Olympics, do these world-renowned competitors have the right to sue if officials did not display enough diligence in clearing a bobsled track for safety after two straight days of sleet and a violent collision occurs?
There are likely no athletes, whether they be a professional or a champion of the weekend battles in the backyard, who have escaped their sport of choice without an occasional physical injury. Do not expect to engage your body in voluntarily, aggressive contact with another human or an intimate object in some way propelled by human strength and leave the experience without any wear on your body. However, there may be legitimate instances in which the damage you sustain is not consistent with the risk you assumed. If you are an athlete working under a signed contract, perhaps you have a clause that offers you financial compensation in the instance that you are injured while playing in an environment or with equipment that does not meet professional standards. On the other hand, what if you face a career-ending blow from an opponent who does not play by the rules of the league in which you participate? If you believe that you have suffered in ways that extend beyond the expected assumption of risk, you should contact an experienced sports or personal injury attorney who will be able to determine the merits of your case. Professional athletes operate in a high-risk, but also highly lucrative, field. Make sure that you are protected and supported to the fullest extent of the law.
Tony R. Bertolino is the managing partner at Bertolino LLP with law offices located in Austin, Houston and San Antonio, Texas. A member of the Trial and Appellate Litigation Team, Mr. Bertolino’s practice is devoted largely to complex transactions, commercial litigation, business law, entertainment law and family law matters. You can read more about Mr. Bertolino at http://www.belolaw.com
Posted by admin at 8:24 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
In Arizona, what legal paperwork do I need to file to preserve an auto Bodily Injury claim?
Car accident almost two years ago and not large enough to hire an attorney if I don’t need to
The state of Arizona has a two-year statute of limitations on filing personal injury lawsuits. As such, if you are injured in any kind of accident for which you are not at fault and plan to sue, your case must be filed within two years of the incident.
Have you been in contact with the claims adjuster from the other party? Are you currently in the midst of negotiations?
Tucson Personal Injury Attorneys Arizona Accident Lawyers Pima County Car Accident Law Firm
Posted by admin at 12:41 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
can i avoid the law here?
i got into an accident with this other womans car. my mom was out of town due to business. she is a doc at a uni. i took her new mercedes out. anyways i got into an accident with this womans car while i was lookin for my cell.. no injuries, but both cars were damaged. i had 2 beers i drank in the car and that was it. i have a drivers permit not a liscence here in cali. a minute amount of alco was involved, i had 2 beers and the bottles ere empty in the car.
my mom is pretty down. she’ll pay for anything. she even buys me drinks and picks me up from parties. i am pretty worried about mmy moms car as its a new silver merc. Can this other lady take me specifically to court? she is a lawyer herself.
ps, i live with my mom..no dad, left a bit ago due to whatever……..i live in Long beach btw….i am a aboy. none of this is my moms fault, its mostly me. shes given me evrything and now i am a directionless punk with no motivation…
Avoid the law? Hardly.
Looks like mom’s parenting skills and leniency haven’t paid off in the long run. Taking her car was your mistake but she is responsible for the damages. Buying you alcohol, dropping you off at parties and allowing you drink underage, not too smart, you obviously have a sense of entitlement and don’t understand the severity and possible consequences behind drinking.
The law and DMV will handle your punishments/penalties but this lady lawyer has an issue with your mother and her insurance company at this point, not you. But you can forget about that driver’s license until your 21. Mommy’s carpooling days aren’t over yet!
Ehline Law Firm PC | Long Beach Aviation Injury Attorney | Helicopter & Airplane Accident Lawyer
