Posted by admin at 9:37 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Motorcycle Accidents Relating to Brain Injuries
There are many possible causes of brain injuries (TBIs), but some of the leading causes are motorcycle accidents. Motorcycle accidents combined with auto accidents are the biggest cause of TBIs in the United States. Auto drivers often do not see motorcyclists on the road or give them the right away which means that motorcyclists are at a higher risk of accident than drivers. For motorcyclists, one out of five involved in accidents sustain head or neck injuries which lead to most motorcyclist deaths.
Motorcyclists, even those who wear helmets, are most likely to sustain non-penetrative injuries to the front of the head, damaging parts of the brain responsible for speech and higher functions. Those without helmets may also be susceptible to a penetrating brain injury, in which an object enters the head and skull, damaging the soft tissue of the brain itself. Helmets Essential to Prevent Traumatic Brain Injury
Study after study shows that the best way to prevent a traumatic brain injury is to wear a helmet approved by the federal Department of Transportation. (Some also carry approval from the Snell Memorial Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to testing the effectiveness of commercial helmets.) In January of 2006, only four states in the U.S. Colorado, Illinois, New Hampshire and Iowa had no law that required motorcyclists to wear a helmet. Twenty-six others had limited helmet laws, usually ones that require helmets for riders who are under 18 or 21.
But even in states without strict helmet laws, riders are still strongly advised that their chances of death or serious head injury are seriously reduced by wearing a helmet. A rider’s failure to equip passengers, particularly passengers who are under 21, with helmets may be considered negligent. And if the helmet is below state and federal standards, poorly fitted, old or has been through a previous accident, that helmet is not safe, may not be legal and will not prevent death, brain damage or another traumatic injury. Other Brain Injury Risks for Motorcyclists
Even though proper equipment significantly cuts down a motorcyclist’s chance of a traumatic brain injury, it is not foolproof. There are other factors that might lead to a motorcycle accident that results in a traumatic brain injury that riders must be cautious of. Before each ride, motorcyclists are encouraged to check their equipment and bikes for troubles; adjust the motorcycle’s tire pressure and suspension when carrying another passenger; wear boots, gloves and other protective gear; and adjust for changing road conditions.
The cost of an accident that causes traumatic brain injury can be severe. A traumatic brain injury causes brain damage that can range from a mild concussion to severe, life-changing disabilities such as trouble communicating, personality changes, schizophrenia, or even a coma. Because the brain cannot heal itself the way other organs do, these are often lifelong problems that cost tens of thousands of dollars to treat. Family members are also affect by brain injuries as they place a serious emotion and financial burden on them. If you or someone you know is the victim of a motorcycle accident causing traumatic brain injury, it is essential to seek out an expert in accidents and TBI who can help reconstruct the accident and secure compensation.
About the Author
For your source for anything legal on the web, go to LegalView.com. At LegalView at http://www.legalview.com , visitors can find complete legal databases as well as an attorney referral service for free. Using the attorney referral service, users can contact attorneys about an array of legal issues including mesothelioma lawyers or auto accident attorneys. Visitors to the site can also find a Brain Injury lawyer at http://brain-injury.legalview.com/
Chicago Motorcycle Accident Attorneys Illinois Bike Accident Injury Lawyers The Horwitz Law Group
Posted by admin at 2:28 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Churchill Surrenders, Roosevelt Appeases, the Ubermensch Dominate
It is May 10th 1940 and Churchill is Prime Minister of Britain. The BBC, Guardian and other left liberal news outlets publish polls stating that 60 % of Britons believe that the war against fascist Germany cannot be won and that the French are an unworthy ally. The questions used in the poll were inadequate containing ambiguous phraseology but the news outlets don’t report this – just the summary results. Instead the media focuses on the hardships, the trauma and destruction of war and record pessimist Britain’s dismay in defeating the Wehrmacht and supporting the fast collapsing French army.
Most of the media is hostile to Churchill, and tired of his bombast. One of their favorites – Lord Halifax prevented from being Prime Minister because he sits in the Lords and not the Commons – convenes many press conferences informing Britons that appeasement with Hitler is the safest guarantor of the British empire. The media endlessly recycles Halifax’s editorials in which he states that fighting Germany contravenes international and British law, since the Jews and Poles provoked the current conflict. He maintains that the British empire has no reason to interfere in the internal politics of Europe and that the two empires can peacefully coexist. Such ideas resonate within the media and their polling affiliates. At the end of May 72 % of Britons feel that Halifax’s demand that peace be sought with Germany would be ‘appropriate’.
To support the anti-war group the BBC broadcasts the already long list of dead military, the perils of fighting Germany alone, portrays the Americans as avaricious Jewish dominated parasites unwilling to formally aid Britain, and proposes that Europe united under one state and one leader is a historical destiny, quelling troublesome feuds once and for all. On British state owned TV well known British music stars and actresses are seen meeting with Hitler in attempts to broker a peace settlement, some more of the more raffish lot are photographed sitting atop Panzer tanks and parading in Gestapo uniforms. Many try to convince the British public that continuing the war with Germany would be unconscionable and will kill millions of innocent children and that the British public must stop their domestic military-industrial complex. A top pop song elaborates that ‘Germans love their children too’. Polls in England state that Churchill has only 22 % general support and almost none amongst women, ethnic, environmental groups and gay rights organizations.
Sympathetic documentaries and films are hurriedly shown in England during May and June 1940, in theatres and on state owned TV, pointing out that Hitlerism and Nazism is nothing more than the realization of Germanic ambition and historical destiny. They focus on German discipline, literary and musical achievements and the valid German need for more land. Indeed Hitler is portrayed in such episodes as a great and noble leader, resurrecting a decrepit and shattered Germany. Nazism is depicted in editorials and on campuses as a uber-philosophy and historical life-force, based on great accomplishments, community-love, and national pride – it is the new world order. The destruction of freedom, life and liberal values are never touched upon. Hitlerism and fascism excites the media and academic elite which publish around the clock, sycophantic essays on the dialectical inevitability of fascist power.
When France falls in June 1940 more polls are published in a frenzy of worried activity revealing that 80 % of Britons are pessimistic or uncertain about the war’s outcome with an astonishing 90 % expressing some level of concern about the government’s performance. Some extreme editorials charge that Churchill lied about the nature of the war and the reality of fighting an invincible Germany during his May 1940 Parliamentary speeches. His speeches and statements are re-parsed, picked over and extensively criticized for their naivety, romanticism and extreme patriotism.
Political and media analysts carp about Churchill’s own past including his poor academic record, his dubious military escapades, and his criminal guilt in the battle of Omdurman in 1898 in the Sudan when black native fighters were destroyed by modern military technology. They also point out Churchill’s personal combat against the Boers, the Indians and Afghans, stating that bigotry and racial hatred are at the core of Churchill’s character. Talk shows abound with analysts and those who ‘know’ Churchill stating that Churchill’s past is inglorious and at odds with current post World War One modernity of enlightened thoughtful liberalism. Even his vain, womanizing syphilitic father, a political star that crashed through arrogance and illness is dragged from the history books to prove that genetically Churchill is an unstable character and the son of drunken political bore.
Churchill’s past and own drinking excesses are front page stories, with news analysts and experts linking Churchill’s terrible character with the losing war effort. Many call for not only Churchill’s resignation but his impeachment for not doing enough to prevent the fall of the British expeditionary army and the humiliation of Dunkirk. The BBC reports that Churchill and his Ministers are not only losing the war, but also profiting from war contracts through firms closely allied with the Conservative political effort and that Churchill has sent his own small fortune out of the country to Canada. No evidence is given on these allegations but no proof is asked for. New public polling puts Churchill with a 13 % approval rating and calls for his resignation echo more loudly each day.
The anti-Conservative and anti-Churchill media also stoke antipathy to Churchill’s new coalition government by focusing on the incapability of British forces to fight. While willful, manly Germany prepares for the invasion of the British Isles, the media is adamant that the government is doing nothing. The British Labor party, sensing Churchill’s political weakness, reveal documents which support the position that the government is disorganized and drifting with no rational plan to wage war. A recently demoted Cabinet member releases photos of a drunk Churchill slurring his words at a private dinner function while discussing war strategy, and publishes letters from Churchill to his War Cabinet which apparently prove that Churchill has no real plan of national defense. Clement Attlee leader of the Labor Party, along with Lord Halifax, holds a press interview on an important TV talk show criticizing Churchill for the Norway fiasco along with inadequate funding of the armed forces and a lack of strategic focus. Atlee contends that appeasing Germany for two to three years, would enable Britain to retool and rearm, and cites the Soviet-Nazi pact of 1939 as an example of judicious statesmanship. Indeed Atlee calls for a British-like ‘Stalin’ to take over the government and re-energize its martial spirit. The media gives Attlee’s criticisms wide coverage and some propose that an Attlee government would have a more nuanced and realistic appraisal of confronting Germany, and would be smart enough to elicit support from ‘allies’ and the international community. Media analysis and polls are produced showing Atlee as Briton’s top choice for Prime Minister.
By mid June 1940 Churchill is in a political quandary. He is now facing low poll numbers, a well funded and media generated appeasement bloc, blame for the Norway fiasco, the poor performance of the British navy and the fall of France. German U-Boat packs threaten to strangle the British economy and the reliance on overseas supplies of food and war materiel puts Britain in an extended and seemingly insuperably hopeless position. Unless the British can defeat the U-Boat threat and hold off the Luftwaffe they are doomed to suffer a crushing invasion. German dominated Europe has 400 million people, and the vast resources of the entire Continent at its disposal, with close airfield and rocket positions, which are easily able to reach major English population and military centers. The situation according to the media and experts, is utterly hopeless.
Military, economic and polling data don’t smile favorably on Churchill in June 1940. Press coverage presents the above problems as insurmountable and emphasizes other weaknesses: budget deficits, low gold reserves, inadequate military production, poor military technology, a contracting economy and shows footage of worried sometimes tearful mothers in their kitchens stating that a European war should not claim the lives of their sons unless the international community sanctions military action and proves that war is necessary. Indeed Atlee, the media and other ‘experts’, are adamant that pre-emptive action cannot be taken against Germany, since such activity violates international laws. The exact laws are never produced nor detailed, but the general concept of international law is accepted by all ‘experts’ and media analysts. Thus assured the media supported by polls, states emphatically that Britain must not provoke Hitler’s wrath.
To combat low polling numbers and bad PR, Churchill’s political handlers advise a change in policy and image. Churchill’s stance against Germany is deemed to be too xenophobic and unnecessarily rough. After all didn’t Hitler state that he admired the British Empire and wanted to cooperate with it? With 300.000 men safely back from Dunkirk Churchill can claim a victory of sorts and start to repair relations with the Nazi’s. Churchill’s handlers advocate a kindler, gentler centrist Churchill. Churchill must stop the anti-German rhetoric, open up trade ties with Greater German Europe, understand the importance of the Nazi philosophy in elevating society and developing human greatness, pay homage to the great artifacts of European culture developed by German genius, and admit that he was wrong about the handling of the war’s early period. They propose that Churchill meet Hitler in Paris to discuss the mutual benefices of cooperation and tolerance. Before doing so Churchill will be photographed at German intellectual institutions and gatherings in London and be seen reading Germany history and philosophy in order to show his sensitivity to German high culture.
In late June 1940 Churchill delivers a press conference clarifying the change in British policy, and stating that he was mistaken about Hitler and now admits he admires this ‘greatest of German leaders’. Churchill emphasizes that he wants to avoid war, bloodshed and societal destruction and resolve all disputes in a spirit of human rights, love, and cultural relativity. He calls for international arbitration and a ‘New League of Nations’ to adjudicate all disputes between German Europe and Britain. After all, as Churchill states during the press reading, no one can possibly imagine that an Anglo Saxon culture is superior to that of the Teuton. Indeed as provided by the media and sundry academics and the recent Hitlerian success it is clear that Germany is a superior civilization to that of Britain. Lastly Churchill offers peace and implores Hitler to grant humane and favorable terms so that, in Churchill’s words, ‘the great civilizations of German and English speaking peoples, can move forward together to broad sunlit uplands.’
The British public are jubilant. Polls reveal that Churchill’s support rebounds from 13 % to 44 % almost overnight. The press is enthusiastic in their praise of this ‘far-sighted elder statesman who takes the middle and centrist course eschewing death and war’. Atlee and Halifax taken by surprise grudgingly admit that Churchill has implemented most of their ideas, though they caution that ‘many details are missing’. International politicians call Churchill’s volte-face a brilliant and humanitarian move, which ensures peace and prosperity. Amnesty International and the Red Cross state that German dominated Europe does not suffer from human rights abuses or concentration camp murders and lend support to Churchill’s magnanimous gesture, stating that they see little in Hitler’s empire that should spark concern. British music stars and movie celebrity’s hold a gala in which British and German politicians and notables toast their respective empire’s health. Churchill’s handlers rush to provide photo-ops of Churchill shaking hands with assorted celebrities and to be seen chatting to Nazi intellectuals to better understand their civilisational philosophy. There is even one photo of Churchill crying while listening to a Wagnerian opera.
In early August 1940 Hitler and Churchill pose for photos in Paris, shake hands, and commit each empire to a 10 year truce with special economic arrangements. The British are forced to mothball the Royal Navy in a show of good will. Unilateralists are overjoyed and ‘peace missions’ to Germany, which are used to establish a bond of ‘trust and love between the two great peoples’, headed by environmentalists, human rights lawyers, and the well to do sons of the political and business elite, receive ample news coverage.
The media, experts and pundits all state that a world war is now avoided. However the Japanese fuelled by military fascism and jingoistic propaganda are convinced that a supine, lazy, stupid America is an easy target. Meeting in Hong Kong, Japanese and German strategists plan the destruction of US naval power. Hitler states in private meetings that the British can be destroyed after the Germans and Japanese annihilate the US fleet and shipping yards. Without US naval assistance Hitler reasons, Britain naturally falls. Tojo describes the Americans as ‘immoral consumerists and sensualists’, laughing at US culture and backwardness and predicts an easy time of wrecking the US navy. Hitler agrees that if Tojo destroys the US Pacific fleet he will immediately declare war and attack US Atlantic shipping and port installations. Hitler predicts that a combined German-Japanese naval attack will destroy the US navy within 6 months and shortly thereafter Britain can be invaded. Detailed German plans for the destruction of US Atlantic shipping assets is drafted.
On December 7 1941 the Japanese efface the US navy at Pearl Harbor and land paratroopers throughout the island chain, taking Hawaii in a few hours. The remaining US army and naval units in Hawaii capitulate. Tojo’s forces follow this easy triumph with concerted naval and land raids along the Alaskan and Californian coasts. The Germans now join in. During December 1941 the entire US coastline on both the West and East are subject to unrelenting Japanese and German raids and sporadic bombings. The psychological effect on the US is overwhelming. Though Roosevelt declared war immediately after December 7 1941, a section of Congress and the House wanted nothing to do with war or hostilities. Much like Churchill Roosevelt now finds himself under sustained media and political attack. The effective and coordinated Germano-Japanese attacks shake the US to its foundation.
Roosevelt’s war budget and war powers act in early 1942 fails to pass both Houses. The media calls for arbitration between the great powers of Japan, Germany and the US. Opposition politicians state that no international support exists for the US and it is time to negotiate. German and Japanese money, bribes and coercion have been effective in the third world. The Arab league with German money as an inducement, unanimously declares that Hitler’s Jewish policy is the only way to solve the ‘Semitic problem’. In exchange for military and economic support Germany receives favorable oil supplies and prices from the Arab League. Latin America, Africa, and Asia recipients of vast quantities of German and Japanese investments and political arm twisting all declare that Germany and Japan are liberators. The US media dutifully reports that most of the world is anti-american and laments about what can be done.
Regional and national groups in the third world publish a long list of Anglo Saxon crimes and refer to the newly created World Court, indictment terms against both Churchill and Roosevelt. The newly instituted ‘Latin American Freedom League’, and newly created ‘African Unity Bloc’ both proclaim the US and England racist colonial powers and call for the conviction in the World Court of both Churchill and Roosevelt on grounds of ‘the historical and modern destruction of non-white Anglo Saxon peoples and civilizations’. The World Court convenes in recently Nazi liberated Baghdad to hear evidence against the US and Britain. The hastily convened ‘New League of Nations’ sitting in Rome since January 1942 states that Germany and Japan are not guilty of war crimes and have only reversed Anglo-Saxon white imperialism. A proposal is forwarded in the New League of Nations by Germany’s ally Italy, which had just finished the subjugation of Ethiopia, Libya and Tunisia, to force the US and Britain to pay reparations for victims of African slavery. The proposition easily passes.
The media in the US and Britain report these proceedings in great detail and put forward theories elaborating the justness and goodness of the German and Japanese empires and why international institutions, cooperation and above all understanding, are vital. The US media and academic lectures relate statistics which purportedly show both Japanese and German GDP growth rising at about 8 % per annum, with unemployment at 2 %. Polling data shows happy and contented citizens in both German Europe and Japanese Asia. Domestic US and British polls reveal that most consider Germany and Japan to be the harbingers of the future and that both the US and Britain must pay for past crimes of imperialism. A US news poll states that 59 % of Americans believe that Hitler and Tojo have just grievances and historical rights to their empire while 67 % believe that Britain and America were guilty of criminal imperial conduct. Meanwhile US-British trade due to U-Boat embargoes and appeasement philosophies dissipates to 10 % of pre 1939 levels. High unemployment, low trade and investment, rationing, and loss of civic freedoms as both the US and British governments impose drastic security measures and censorship befall both nations.
Shortly after the convening of the New League of Nations in Rome and the expulsion of the US representative on the grounds that ‘US slavery of blacks cannot be condoned in a world body’ , Roosevelt faces domestic impeachment for war crimes for interning Japanese Americans. The thousands of US dead, a destroyed Pacific fleet and ruined communities on both coasts are ignored. The media runs endless recitations of Japanese internment camp footage and abuse. In addition the domestic US political opposition repeatedly and endlessly documents the elitist upbringing of Roosevelt, his avoidance of any military duty whatsoever, his persistent womanizing and whiskeying, and his crippling illness. Privately in back rooms Roosevelt is given an option – officially sign an armistice with Germany and Japan, pay reparations to the New League of Nations for past US crimes, or face impeachment. As well part of this deal includes the repudiation of Churchill and Great Britain and a stern denouncement of the evil actions of the British empire in times current and past. Roosevelt complies. The US media focuses on the terrible conditions of Germans interned in Britain and hails Roosevelt’s volte-face and pro-German policy as ‘far sighted and nuanced.’
In early March 1942 the US ratifies in both Houses a non-aggression pact and economic treaty with both Japan and Hitler. As part of the deal the US must destroy its navy and long range missiles and guarantee that it will not aid Britain in the event of war. Roosevelt signs the document citing poll numbers which state that 65 % of Americans do not like the idea of a war, and that 50 % of Americans do not trust Churchill or the British. The media publish stories on Churchill’s drunkenness, excessive European and German GDP growth and show US actors and writers in Tokyo, who document the perfection of Japanese solidarity and their amazement at Japanese economic success. One actress gushes that she will soon move to Tokyo to be at ‘the centre of man’s future’. The impeachment case against Roosevelt is dropped and the media stops running footage of Japanese internment camp abuses. Roosevelt is saved.
Much to media and academic amazement during 1943 fascist military autocracies take over the main nation states in Africa, Latin America, Mexico, and South Asia. The few critics who protested appeasement under the guise of the ‘domino effect’ are suddenly proved correct. For some weeks the US and British media appear confused. Then the political and media elite begin to recast the story. Indeed the spread of fascism excites the media and academic elite who are effusive of their praise of ‘these strong brave leaders, leading their countries to a better future.’ Only a handful of quasi-democracies remain and these, the mainstream media assures its public, are historical oddities. Ubermensch ideology and communitarian fascism are pronounced in editorials and classrooms as mankind’s future.
The German-American Club for Freedom and its President Henry Ford, explain to the US public that the German model is the society of historical destiny. Ford goes on an extensive public tour describing the massive business opportunities for Ford and other corporations in Europe and his respect for Hitler. After all Ford reasons, ‘Hitler has provided security and continuity – both are essential for business planning.’ On a popular TV talk show Ford describes his thrill in meeting the Fuhrer stating ‘never have I met such a great man. He is a monument of history.’ In contrast Ford describes his meeting with Churchill on the same trip as disappointing and describes Churchill as a ‘sodden, drunken relic of the British racist imperialist past.’ Orsen Wells produces a sycophantic film on Hitler, and George Orwell is first fined then imprisoned in England for writing anti-fascist essays. Environmental studies are published showing how careful Germany and Japan are with their natural resources and how green their societies are. The German idea of recycling plastic and paper using green bins becomes widely emulated. German pop music and Japanese dress become quite popular. Across the US and Britain political science courses dealing with ‘Dialectical Materialism and Fascist Destiny’ become the campus rage and German language enrollments blossom. Sensitivity courses on cultural differences are encouraged in high school.
In a private meeting of the great powers in Yalta in April 1943 Hitler threatens Roosevelt with a combined Soviet-German invasion of the US East coast unless the US increases its shipments in oil and key military-industrial technologies in exchange for bartered goods, labor camp produced product, and Russian wheat. Roosevelt without a Navy complies though he tells Hitler that the concentration camps and Jewish liquidation is creating domestic political problems in the US as reporters slowly report on these atrocities across Europe. Hitler replies that the camps and the elimination of the Jews are mere capitalist fantasies and that Roosevelt must silence such slander. Roosevelt is also non-plussed when Hitler demands, in exchange for decreasing European tariff barriers from 100 to 96 %, that the US limit its airforce to 10 squadrons available for domestic security. High unemployment, lagging industrial production and a world economy which is increasingly marginalized and closed off, dropping polling numbers and unrest in sensitive re-election states, convince the US President to sign the accord. Roosevelt is thus able to proclaim a great diplomatic and economic triumph to the US media forecasting a 15 % rise over 2 years in US exports to Europe. Roosevelt’s poll numbers move up to above a 55 % approval rating with many polls citing that by standing up to Hitler Roosevelt has proven himself to be a strong leader.
Meanwhile in England a confused, and angry Churchill loses his Conservative leadership in a coup plotted by Halifax and Anthony Eden. Tired of Churchill’s obstinacy and endless nagging over German aggression and fascist destruction of liberty, the moderate centrists of the Conservative party assemble a convention and on a one member-one vote basis, vote 78 % in demanding the resignation of the obstinate unrealistic Churchill. Churchill’s steadily anti-German policy is for the Halifax-Eden group not centrist or nuanced enough. The resolution against Churchill was particularly scathing about Churchill’s lack of compassion towards Germanic historical grievances, the role of the Jew in destroying German culture and Churchill’s apparent inability to appear sensitive in public alienating the female, gay and media voting blocs. The political destruction of Churchill according to media polls is favorably endorsed by 72 % of the population.
Weary, sick and dazed by what has transpired Churchill becomes ill and dies 6 months after being ousted from office. Roosevelt in great pain from his polio, fatigued and belittled by innuendo and conflicting poll numbers and media disparagement, quietly slips into death 2 weeks later. Charles Lindbergh takes over the leadership of the Democratic party and easily wins election as President with his party dominating in a landslide both the House and Senate. US polls cite the pro-German Lindbergh with 87 % popular support. Further polls state that 42 % of Americans feel that their best ally is Germany with 32 % citing Japan. Only 15 % believe that Britain is a worthwhile ally. TV media coverage documents the new era of ‘responsible American international orientation.’ Funding for the New League of Nations is doubled. Hollywood starlets burble about the alluring sensual mystique of pure Aryan Nazism. American women flock to Berlin seeking marriage with virtuous beautiful Nazi men and to escape the mongrel culture of America.
One year after their deaths both Churchill and Roosevelt are indicted by their national legislatures and the World Court in Baghdad as war criminals for imperialist crimes against humanity. Six months later Britain is invaded and conquered by a massive Euro-Germany army. In May of 1945 the US agrees to hand over its continental coastal territories in the west to Japan and in the east to Germany in order to avoid a direct invasion. As well the remaining nub of American sovereignty stops all military and nuclear arms production. The US media declares this a realistic foreign policy stating that 64 % of Americans feel that war is evil. A last poll cites 85 % of Americans as being confused and afraid with 75 % stating that they don’t trust the media or the political elite. After Germany and Japan reorder their new US based territories, all media transmission and polling data suddenly and dramatically, stops. It is unclear what percent of the population supported this action.
Posted by admin at 7:55 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
¿I can shadow the work of a corporate lawyer or criminal 13 years?
I have 13 years and I'm very focused to become a corporate lawyer or criminal. I love the shade of a job, but I'm not sure a couple of things: 1. I do at 13? 2. What are the differences between the normal duties of a corporate lawyer and criminal? 3. How would I go about this Tacoma? (E-mail or telephone, local businesses, etc.) Thanks. So what would I do? Just watch or real help, in any way? Or should vary in different law firms / lawyers?
As a lawyer, I would not want to allow a sit-in 13 in meetings with clients or attend court proceedings on matters of major customers. This is a bad idea for several reasons. You should expect to Are you in college. Plenty of time to do so.
Posted by admin at 1:43 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
I just got DWI yesterday, can I represent myself and still not get screwed?
my first offense, I kind of want to represent myself.. I blew a 1.5.. I also admitted to being drunk.. Im def goin to plead guilty, I dont want to hire an attorney to hold my hand or something, can I do this by myself?? I got this in New York by the way
1. I understand my actions, and I def dont expect to get a slap on the wrist.. I dont have the money to get a lawyer though.. after I find out what the laws are whats my first step… contact the judge maybe??
As they say, “if you represent yourself in court, you have a fool for a client”. You already plead guilty when you admitted to being drunk.
Let’s hope that the cop does not show up in court to testify against you.
Posted by admin at 3:32 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
If you were Eliot Spitzer’s defense lawyer how to defend him against charges that he violated the Mann act?
One of the possible criminal charges against Eliot Spitzer is that he violated The Mann act.
The Mann act makes it a crime to transport anyone across state lines for the purposes of Prostitution.
Eliot Spitzer paid to have the Prostitute known by her pseudonym “Kristen” travel from New York to Washington DC for the purpose of engaging in the act of Prostitution.
How would you defend Eliot Spitzer against this charge if you were the defense attorney for Eliot Spitzer?
Good one!
I am applying to law schools right now. I hope to be accepted to law school and be in law school this fall.
I would attack two points. First that Eliot Spitzer did not transport the woman.
Second i would challenge the notion that she was engaged in the act of prostitution.
With respect to transportation: the woman got to Washington DC on her own. Eliot Spitzer did not transport her there.
Eliot Spitzer did not put her in his car. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a bus. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a train. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a plane.
How did Eliot Spitzer transport her there? The answer is: Eliot Spitzer did not transport her there.
“Kristin” transported herself to Washington DC.
If someone did transport “Kristin” to Washington DC it was not Eliot Spitzer.
If Eliot Spitzer did not transport her to Washington DC, Eliot Spitzer cannot possibly be in violation of the Mann act.
I would also attack the question of whether or not “Kristin” was engaged in the act of prostitution with Eliot Spitzer although based on the facts that I have seen reported so far, I think that would be more of a challenge.
Again, you would require that an act of sex in exchange for money ever took place to prove Prostitution.
I suppose I would challenge the prosecution to prove that an act of sex even took place.
What proof would the prosecution have? Did they have video cameras in the room where the act of sex is supposed to have taken place? Did they have undercover agents watching through peepholes?
Of course it is possible that they will be able to make the woman testify against Eliot Spitzer.
I would challenge her testimony on the basis that she is guilty of many other crimes and is lying because the prosecution has offered her leniency if she testifies against Eliot Spitzer.
The prosecution will reply with the recordings of Eliot Spitzer that they made. I would challenge those as illegal and inadmissable.
Also the Prosecution will respond with the proof of the exchange of money.
I would challenge their proof that an exchange of money took place and more importantly I would challenge that the act of sex that is required to establish the act of Prostitution never took place.
How did I do. Did I pass my exam professor?
About MarcusBonsib Greenbelt Maryland Criminal Law Lawyers Washington DC Civil Litigation Law Firm
Posted by admin at 12:07 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Gulf of ships off the risk of collision Shows by workers in the maritime industry, Houston Lawyers say when negligence or bad conditions seaworthiness of a ship is to blame for an accident at sea, maritime workers injured and their families may be eligible for compensation, for example, Houston attorneys Kurt Arnold, Jason Itkin. Houston Texas Personal Injury Lawyer
Posted by admin at 5:34 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Uninsured accident in Tampa FL?
I have a 50 cc scooter and accidentally rear ended a car traveling about 10 mph or less. The accident left a couple of scratches on the size of the palm of my hand. When it happened, I talked about it and told him I had no insurance and pay someone to fix paint your bumper, was quick to say someone was a witness and gave him a business card of a lawyer. That day, I received a call from her sure she was a free clinic and trying to find the money for an injury, and who had no insurance (which is not required to have insurance on a motorcycle in Florida) who want to pay for everything. There was no accident report with the police. Does anyone know what really can happen to me? What I can do about it?
No police report? Florida law requires that states an accident if there is injury involved, or if property damage exceeds $ 500.00. His failure to file a police report and is now trying to collect tips from injury of fraud, especially since a "witness" was desirable not to present the card of a lawyer. You need a attorney or consult with legal counsel.
Hancock Law Firm Tampa Florida Personal Injury Attorney
Posted by admin at 9:39 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Lakeland Personal Injury Lawyers Win $7.25 Million Verdict – Jury Holds Polk County Sheriffs Office in Contempt
David C. Dismuke and John P. Berke of Burnetti, P.A obtain verdict for plaintiff killed by driver under the influence of methamphetamine. Polk County Sheriffs Office fails to take legal action against intoxicated defendant. Personal Injury Attorney Tampa (813) 498-7566 Tampa Personal Injury Attorneys
Posted by admin at 4:31 PM. Placed in Uncategorized category
Two die from separate motorcycle accidents in san bernardino county
On Sunday evening, February 13, two motorcyclists involved in separate accidents in San Bernardino County died as a result of their injuries.
The Press-Enterprise reported that the 23-year-old man who was riding his motorcycle on Foothill Boulevard in Fontana crashed when the driver of a vehicle turned left in front of him.
Another motorcycle accident that occurred on the same night in San Bernardino County took place in Rancho Cucamonga and involved a 25-year-old man who was trying to pass a truck. The motorcyclist was going 70 to 75 miles per hour on his Kawasaki ZR750-F in the southbound lanes of Interstate 15 near Foothill Boulevard when he sped into the left rear of a tractor-trailer, according to California Highway Patrol officers as The Press-Enterprise reports.
In a written statement, Officer Jeff Briggs explained that due to the motorcyclist’s unsafe speed, the front of his motorcycle hit the tractor-trailer. The impact caused major blunt force trauma to the motorcyclist’s upper torso. He later died as a result of his injuries.
The flatbed truck and trailer did not stop at the accident scene.
Riding motorcycles carries extra risks. Some are from other drivers who don’t always see a motorcycle, and some are from the motorcyclists themselves who sometimes use excessive speeds and unsafe lane changes. While drivers in cars can also speed and make unsafe lane changes, the chances of injury can be greater for motorcyclists because there is no compartment that can shield their bodies from some of the impact.
We hold the families and friends of the victims of these latest motorcycle accidents in San Bernardino County in our thoughts.
If you are in an accident, you need support. AA-Accident Attorneys provides their clients the expert legal help to win results. You can feel confident that the car accident lawyer
who represents you knows your concerns, and the issues you face with crowded roads, freeways, and highways that can lead to automobile accidents, motorcycle accidents, bus accidents, and truck accidents. The car accident lawyer
knows these issues from the inside and out-as a legal professional and as a citizen who shares the road and lives in the communities.
AA-Accident Attorneys serves clients in many locations across the United States, and has a car accident lawyer
to represent you in San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange County, San Fernando Valley, Ontario, Newport Beach, Los Angeles, Fresno, San Jose, San Francisco, Sacramento, and Las Vegas. About the Author
This article is written by a professional auto accident lawyers at aa-accidentattorneys.com. Visit AA Accidentattorneys.com and find expert car accident lawyer
, wrongful death, truck accident, personal injury attorneys, car accident lawyer
, San Fernando Valley, and Newport Beach. Call us for a free consultation for your case at 877-477-5477.
San Jose Personal Injury Attorney Explains Workplace Injury Lawsuit and Actions
Posted by admin at 1:18 AM. Placed in Uncategorized category
New York Personal Injury Attorney (Ny) – 866-Atty-Law
New York State (NY) is one of the most densely populated states of the US and gets visited by millions of tourists from all across the world. This has resulted in a substantial increase in the population. There are millions of auto vehicles including cars, motorbikes, trucks and other vehicles plying on the New York’s narrow and congested roads. There are several injury and accident cases reported from New York City (NYC) each and every day. Some of these accidents could result in serious injuries. A personal injury can also result from the negligence or deliberate actions of some individual or authority. If you are involved in any such type of accident or have received personal injuries then you could be eligible for the personal injury compensation.
Some of the accidents can result in minor or major injuries which can sometimes prove fatal to the victim. Most of the accidents happen due to negligence of the drivers, driver conditions, or maybe due to drunken driving. It is unfortunate that innocent victims become part of the accident which was never their fault. Further, most of these at-fault individuals who caused the accident can easily get away from their responsibility and are not charged under Criminal law (since it was an an accident and not a deliberate action).
However, a dangerous action by an individual such as a rash-driving or driving under influence can be brought to justice under the New York’s Personal Injury Law. In several of these cases it is observed that the other auto drivers/pedestrians got fatally injured as a result of these negligent acts.
New York State (NYS) Personal Injury Law handles these cases and provides justice and compensation to the victims of negligence or negligent actions of some individual, authority or entity (private or public). If you or your loved ones are a victim of personal injury within New York then you should get in touch with a New York personal injury attorney who will help you receive justice and compensation. Your personal injury claim will provide compensation for the medical bills, medical treatment, injury, trauma and several others. It will also provide compensation for the lost wages (if the victim is an earning individual or sole bread winner of their family).
There are a few professional personal injury attorneys who work on contingency basis. These lawyers will provide their legal services without charging anything from you. They will only get a percentage from the final compensation amount, only if they are able to win your case and the compensation amount. This way, you don’t have to pay anything before hiring a personal injury attorney.
Your personal injury attorney will work on the victim’s behalf. A personal injury attorney has specialization in various types of personal injuries including auto accident injuries, medical malpractice, birth injuries and several other types of personal injuries. If your lawyer is well versed with the different types of injury cases can your chances of winning a case will be higher.
If you are involved in an accident then you could also receive some odd responses from your insurance company. Most of the people purchase insurance covers in order to help and provide support to their families in case of any unfortunate accident or injury. However, most of these insurance companies use under-hand tactics to nullify your genuine compensation amount. They will try their best to find loopholes in your injury claim and there are several cases where genuine injury compensation claims were denied by the insurance companies.
Therefore you must get in touch with your personal injury attorney who will help you receive justice and compensation for your injuries. Your injury attorney will guide you on how to pursue your case and will help you receive compensation from the negligent individual, authority or entity involved.
New York Personal Injury Attorney – 866-ATTY-LAW represents victims of personal injuries, accident injuries, and medical malpractice/negligence within New York (NY). Call us at 1-866-ATTY-LAW for a free legal consultation.
